Imagine a compliance system cost $12,000 annually. Are you paying too much?
It depends on what you’re replacing.
If automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology environment can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious work it could be a well-spent amount of money. If a seven person startup could have similar evidence in just a couple of hours every month, the amount is very different.
It’s a smart method to begin the look for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the most advanced features isn’t the only thing to consider. Ask your company about how these features will help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing is an End-of-Even
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. The value of compliance automation alters as the business grows. Imagine a technology company that is growing with hundreds of employees, several cloud environments, a variety of applications, and frequently access changes. Continuously gathering evidence manually could cause a significant operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence could easily justify the expense.
Think about a company with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide vast capabilities, but these capabilities deliver financial value only when the company actually needs the capabilities.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
Looking for Vanta or Drata quickly becomes a feature-by -feature task. The two platforms are built around automation and interconnected, so organizations looking for this kind of solution can benefit by comparing the frameworks supported with their integrations, service, as well as individual quotations and contracts.
You’ll need to decide on another thing first. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence gathering. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence by themselves, especially when the work load is not too heavy.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are platforms that have a more minimalist design which focus more on organization rather than connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a single workspace that offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence.
Access to the Factor System into the Decision
Removal of integrations comes with an obvious disadvantage: somebody must gather evidence manually.
This is a way to eliminate the need for integration and the application of compliance is not dependent on an interface to the operating environment.
There is no universally superior architecture. It is essential to consider what tradeoffs are appropriate for your company.
CertAssist is targeted at groups that comprise between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its prices, rather than requiring an initial sales call to determine the price at which to start. The price for its launch is $225 per month which is compared to a standard price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today may not be the same for 500 or 100 employees.
The compliance can be maintained using a the help of a basic platform. The costs of automation will be increased as systems, employees and frameworks multiply. Let complexity play a role when it comes to purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations because they appear impressive in a chart of comparison. Spend money on them only when the manual job they replace becomes the more expensive option.
